Showing posts with label Victor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victor. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Victor & Father & Freud

The book opens up Freud's "Interpretation of Dreams" with the Oedipus Complex. They start with,
In my experience, which is already extensive, the chief part in the mental lives of all children who later become psychoneurotics is played by their parents. Being in love with the one parent and hating the other are among the essential constituents of the stock of psychical impulses which is formed at that time and which is of such importance in determining the symptoms of the later neurosis.
Moments of love and hatred are always magnified to the child's mind (814). This theory makes sense, considering Victor's relationship with his father (or what he deems worthy enough to repeat to Walton). The fact that the first information Victor reveals about his father is the man's "honour and reputation...respected by all who knew him for his integrity and indefatigable attention to public business" (18). The first information we hear from Victor about Victor's relationship with his father, the first time the two communicate is when his father "looked carelessly" at Victor's book. The first thing the man says in the novel is, My dear Victor, do not waste your time upon this; it is sad trash" (21). Readers even get Victor's reaction... or his perception of his reaction, as we need to remember that he is recalling and retelling this to Walton. Victor doesn't take pains to hide his resentment towards his father: If, instead of this remark, my father had taken the pains to explain to me... under such circumstances, I should have thrown Agrippa asside... It is even possible, that the train of my ideas would never have received the fatal impulse that led to my ruin. But the cursory glance my father had taken of my volume by no means assured me that he was acquainted with its contents" (21-22). Victor believes that his father's glance didn't "assure" him that his father was knowledgable of the contents, but his resentment earlier in the paragraph resounds louder.
Applying Freud to the theory makes sense: early in Victor's experience of the scientific world, his father's reaction and facial expression is enough to make a lasting impression on Victor- so much so that he includes it in his retelling of his story. This was a feeling on a "magnified scale," most likely of hatred (as opposed to love), in response to his father.
The fact that this moment is included in Victor's account- that Shelley includes it, even- is remarkable.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Kant, Frankenstein, and the Sublime

Kant writes that, "We call sublime that which is absolutely great" (pg 433 of Norton), and he gives us the definition: "That is sublime in comparison with which everything else is small" (same page). In Frankenstein, Victor encounters what he considers the sublime in nature several times. What effect does this have on him? It seems like his "mind feels itself moved in the representation of the sublime in nature" (Kant pg 437), but does it have any other effects? Does it in any way make Victor himself feel small? Does this have a humbling effect on his person? Or is he merely moved by the sublime in the moment, to forget about it afterwards?